A wave of controversy has erupted after former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki made remarks about Vice President JD Vance and his wife, Usha, during a recent podcast appearance. Speaking on I’ve Had It, Psaki referred to Vance as a “little Manchurian candidate” and joked that his wife should “blink four times” if she needed help — a comment that quickly spread online and drew criticism across the political spectrum. Even some of Psaki’s usual supporters described the remarks as inappropriate and in poor taste.
Vice President Vance responded with composure, calling Psaki’s comments “disgraceful” while praising his wife as his “wonderful partner and best friend.” The viral clip ignited a larger discussion about respect, boundaries, and double standards in political media. Critics accused Psaki of crossing personal lines, while others argued that her remarks reflect a growing lack of civility in modern political discourse.
White House Communications Director Steven Cheung joined the backlash, calling Psaki “talentless” and accusing her of “trying to stay relevant by attacking others.” Online commentators echoed similar views, suggesting her comments reflected frustration among some media figures amid shifting political dynamics. Others compared the incident to past controversies involving her successor, Karine Jean-Pierre, who has faced scrutiny over her defense of President Biden’s public image.
Although Psaki has not issued an apology or clarification, the incident has reignited debate about humor, ethics, and professionalism in political commentary. Many argue that targeting families for laughs only widens divisions and distracts from meaningful discussion. The uproar surrounding Psaki’s comments serves as a reminder that in today’s media landscape, even a single remark can spark national attention — and shape the tone of public debate.